A comparative study of removal of Cr(VI) by ion exchange resins bearing quaternary ammonium groups

dc.contributor.authorKusku, Ozge
dc.contributor.authorRivas, Bernabe L.
dc.contributor.authorUrbano, Bruno F.
dc.contributor.authorArda, Muserref
dc.contributor.authorKabay, Nalan
dc.contributor.authorBryjak, Marek
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-27T22:14:43Z
dc.date.available2019-10-27T22:14:43Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.departmentEge Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUNDIon exchange resins based on poly[(4-vinylbenzyl) trimethylammonium chloride] P(ClVBTA) and poly[(3-acrylamidopropyl) trimethyl ammonium chloride] P(ClAPTA) were synthesized by radical polymerization. Metal ion uptake experiments were run with these synthesized resins and compared with the commercially available anion exchange resin Amberlite IRA-400. RESULTSRetention of Cr(VI) was found to be independent of pH and the co-existence of Cl- and SO42- ions for two resins. The sorption data obtained were evaluated using well-known kinetic and adsorption isotherm models. The kinetic data obtained for the two resins fitted well to the pseudo-second-order model and the Langmuir isotherm. Besides, it was observed that temperature influenced slightly the sorption properties of the ion exchange resins synthesized in this study and commercially available ion exchange resin Amberlite IRA-400. CONCLUSIONSThe synthetic resins showed a better sorption performance than a commercially available ion exchange resin. The P(ClVBTA) and P(ClAPTA) resins exhibited greater and faster sorption than Amberlite IRA-400. Sorption capacities of these ion exchangers were found to be in the order P(ClAPTA)>P(ClVBTA)>Amberlite IRA-400. (c) 2014 Society of Chemical Industry.en_US
dc.description.sponsorship7FP-MC Actions Grant CHILTURPOL2 (PIRSES-GA) [269153]; FONDECYTComision Nacional de Investigacion Cientifica y Tecnologica (CONICYT)CONICYT FONDECYT [1110079]; PIA [ACT-130]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors thank 7FP-MC Actions Grant CHILTURPOL2 (PIRSES-GA-2009 Project, grant number: 269153), FONDECYT (Grant No 1110079) and PIA (ACT-130) for financial support. We also thank Dr David Contreras for the elemental analysis measurements.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/jctb.4320
dc.identifier.endpage857en_US
dc.identifier.issn0268-2575
dc.identifier.issn1097-4660
dc.identifier.issn0268-2575en_US
dc.identifier.issn1097-4660en_US
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage851en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.4320
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11454/50057
dc.identifier.volume89en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000336508000011en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjection exchangeen_US
dc.subjecthexavalent chromiumen_US
dc.subjectquaternary ammoniumen_US
dc.subjectisothermen_US
dc.subjectkineticsen_US
dc.titleA comparative study of removal of Cr(VI) by ion exchange resins bearing quaternary ammonium groupsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar