Comparison of psoriasis area and severity index and physician’s global assessment in determining psoriasis severity

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorscopusid56417418700
dc.authorscopusid57553440200
dc.authorscopusid57016742200
dc.authorscopusid36901752500
dc.authorscopusid7004181307
dc.contributor.authorAcar A.
dc.contributor.authorBozkurt A.
dc.contributor.authorYenipazar G.K.
dc.contributor.authorAlper S.
dc.contributor.authorCeylan C.
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-12T20:26:50Z
dc.date.available2023-01-12T20:26:50Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.departmentN/A/Departmenten_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: In clinical studies, it is crucial to assess psoriasis severity accurately and with no substantial variation between different raters. The Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) and Physician Global Assessment (PGA) are the two most commonly used tools for the assessment of psoriasis severity. The aim of this study was to evaluate the intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of these methods and to determine whether inter-rater reliability is affected by rater experience. Design: An open uncontrolled study Setting: Dermatology Department of Ege University, Medical Faculty Subjects: Fifty-five patients with plaque psoriasis who were examined between 15 August 2012 and 15 November 2012 in the dermatology department of Ege University Interventions: Three dermatology residents with varying experience evaluated the patients individually using both the PASI and PGA for each patient (in that order). Main Outcome Measure: PASI and PGA Results: PASI and PGA scores showed high intra-rater correlation for all three residents. Inter-rater reliability for PASI was high between the most experienced and second most experienced resident and between the most experienced and least experienced resident. However, inter-rater reliability for PGA was high between the most experienced and second most experienced residents, but only moderate between the most experienced and least experienced resident. Conclusions: There were no significant interrater differences between PGA and PASI scores in our study. However, because PGA is more subjective and may be affected by rater experience, PASI is considered to be a more reliable method for assessing severity of psoriasis. © 2021, Kuwait Medical Association. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage407en_US
dc.identifier.issn00235776
dc.identifier.issn0023-5776en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85127198601en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/Aen_US
dc.identifier.startpage402en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11454/80117
dc.identifier.volume53en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherKuwait Medical Associationen_US
dc.relation.ispartofKuwait Medical Journalen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectphysician global assessmenten_US
dc.subjectpsoriasis area and severity indexen_US
dc.subjectpsoriasis severity scoreen_US
dc.subjectadalimumaben_US
dc.subjectcyclosporineen_US
dc.subjectetanercepten_US
dc.subjectetretinen_US
dc.subjectinfliximaben_US
dc.subjectmethotrexateen_US
dc.subjectadulten_US
dc.subjectArticleen_US
dc.subjectcontrolled studyen_US
dc.subjectdisease severityen_US
dc.subjectfemaleen_US
dc.subjecthumanen_US
dc.subjectinterrater reliabilityen_US
dc.subjectmajor clinical studyen_US
dc.subjectmetaboliteen_US
dc.subjectmiddle ageden_US
dc.subjectoutcome assessmenten_US
dc.subjectphototherapyen_US
dc.subjectpsoriasisen_US
dc.subjectPsoriasis Area and Severity Indexen_US
dc.titleComparison of psoriasis area and severity index and physician’s global assessment in determining psoriasis severityen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu