Wingate anaerobic testing with a modified electromagnetically braked elliptical trainer. Part I: Methodological considerations

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorOzkaya, Ozgur
dc.contributor.authorColakoglu, Muzaffer
dc.contributor.authorOzgonenel, Okan
dc.contributor.authorFowler, Dianne
dc.contributor.authorColakoglu, Sule
dc.contributor.authorTekat, Atilla
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-27T20:20:53Z
dc.date.available2019-10-27T20:20:53Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.departmentEge Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to modify an elliptical trainer and determine a suitable test load with it in order to perform Wingate anaerobic testing (WAnTet). Modifications were made to an electromagnetically braked elliptical trainer. Study participants were forty-eight physically active male college athletes ( mean age 20 +/- 1 years). Two pilot studies (n = 8) were administered to determine electrical signalling errors and to select the range of potentially suitable test loads ( between 0.5 to 1.3 watt/kg). The 1.0 watt/kg WAnTet load was determined to be the most suitable for WAnTet applications amongst 0.8 to 1.1 watt/kg loads ( n = 40; p < 0.05). Test-retest results using the 1.0 watt/ kg load for peak power ( PP) ( 1477 +/- 258 and 1484 +/- 271 watts), average power (AP) ( 1134 +/- 209 and 1120 +/- 208 watts), fatigue index ratio (FI%) ( 49 +/- 10% and 49 +/- 10%) and change in lactate levels ( 12.6 +/- 1.7 and 12.4 +/- 2.1 mM) were highly correlated (r: 0.94, 0.94, 0.80 and 0.74, respectively; p < 0.001). An electromagnetically braked elliptical trainer may be used to measure anaerobic power and anaerobic capacity of athletes and may be substituted for the usual Wingate anaerobic test performed on a cycle ergometer.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipAcibadem Health Group ( Istanbul, Turkey)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors would like to give special thanks to the Acibadem Health Group for the material support they provided. The authors also would like to thank Cem Seref Bediz for his editorial assistance. This study was sponsored by the Acibadem Health Group ( Istanbul, Turkey).en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3233/IES-2009-0341
dc.identifier.endpage113en_US
dc.identifier.issn0959-3020
dc.identifier.issn1878-5913
dc.identifier.issn0959-3020en_US
dc.identifier.issn1878-5913en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage107en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3233/IES-2009-0341
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11454/41686
dc.identifier.volume17en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000267950800009en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherIos Pressen_US
dc.relation.ispartofIsokinetics and Exercise Scienceen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectModificationen_US
dc.subjectWingate anaerobic testen_US
dc.subjectelliptical traineren_US
dc.subjectcycle ergometeren_US
dc.titleWingate anaerobic testing with a modified electromagnetically braked elliptical trainer. Part I: Methodological considerationsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu