ESSENTIAL AND NON-ESSENTIAL HEAVY METAL CONSTITUENTS OF GERMAN CHAMOMILE: EFFECT OF DIFFERENT FARMING SYSTEMS

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorEsetlili, Bihter Colak
dc.contributor.authorTepecik, Mahmut
dc.contributor.authorCobanoglu, Ozgur
dc.contributor.authorAnac, Dilek
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-27T22:05:31Z
dc.date.available2019-10-27T22:05:31Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.departmentEge Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractTwo different experiments were conducted with German chamomile grown according to conventional and organic farming systems. Flower (drug) and shoot yields were determined, and their essential (Fe, Zn, Mn and Cu) and non-essential heavy metal (Pb, Ni, Co, Cr and Cd) contents were measured and the results were compared according to treatments: control-without treatment to fertilization, 15:15:15 + ammonium nitrate (AN) + potassium sulfate (KS), monopotassium sulfate (MKP) + AN + KS, control + farmyard manure (FYM) + sulphur (S), bone meal (BM) + zeolite (Z) + FYM + S, rock phosphate (RP) + Z + FYM + S. It can be concluded that the yield responses of chamomile in 15:15:15 treatment of the conventional and BM (bone meal) + Z (zeolite) treatment of the organic experimentation were significant. All of these findings showed that there is not a significant metal accumulation risk for chamomile cultivated either according to the conventional farming system or to the standards of organic farming because all of the studied essential and non-essential metals are generally low or very slightly over the acceptable limits.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipTUBITAKTurkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Arastirma Kurumu (TUBITAK) [110O733]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe present study was carried out in the framework of the 110O733 project financed by the TUBITAK research program.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage3453en_US
dc.identifier.issn1018-4619
dc.identifier.issn1610-2304
dc.identifier.issn1018-4619en_US
dc.identifier.issn1610-2304en_US
dc.identifier.issue12Cen_US
dc.identifier.startpage3449en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11454/48470
dc.identifier.volume23en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000349805700005en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherParlar Scientific Publications (P S P)en_US
dc.relation.ispartofFresenius Environmental Bulletinen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectMatricaria chamomillaen_US
dc.subjectnon-essential heavy metalsen_US
dc.subjectessential heavy metalsen_US
dc.subjectconventional farmingen_US
dc.subjectorganic farmingen_US
dc.subjectfertilizeren_US
dc.titleESSENTIAL AND NON-ESSENTIAL HEAVY METAL CONSTITUENTS OF GERMAN CHAMOMILE: EFFECT OF DIFFERENT FARMING SYSTEMSen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu