Trial processes of deontological crimes in Discipline Committee of İzmir Chamber of Pharmacists and High Discipline Committee of Turkish Association of pharmacists and determining the factors affecting them [Deontoloji·k suçlarin İzmi·r Eczaci Odasi Onur Urulu ve Türk eczacilari bi·rli·gi· yüksek onur kurulu'nda yargilama süreçleri· ve buna etki·li· faktörleri·n saptanmasi]
Küçük Resim Yok
Tarih
2009
Yazarlar
Dergi Başlığı
Dergi ISSN
Cilt Başlığı
Yayıncı
Erişim Hakkı
info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
Özet
This study is aimed to determine the differences between the features of the cases sent to Discipline Committee and differences of decisions made by High Discipline Committee and also to identify the features affecting these differences. The research is cross-sectional. The data is compiled from 312 case files sent to Discipline Committee between the years of 1985-2010 with the help of a data form consisting 30 questions. It was found out that more than half of the judgements were reversed by High Discipline Committee, of these 33.7% without due process of law 32.6% imbalance of offence and penalty were the reasons. The cases related to the actions contrary to the actions to the protocol rules of Social Security Institution awaited longer compared to other files (p<0.05). The cases that had the penalty of defrocking waited longer than the other cases in the board of administrators and they were concluded in a shorter time and also the cases given the pecuniary fine were concluded earlier than the others in High Discipline Committee. Results revealed that regulations intended to improve the committees' work are necessary.
Açıklama
Anahtar Kelimeler
Deontological crimes, Discipline Committee of İzmir Chamber of Pharmacists, High Discipline Committee, Judgement process
Kaynak
Ankara Universitesi Eczacilik Fakultesi Dergisi
WoS Q Değeri
Scopus Q Değeri
Q4
Cilt
38
Sayı
4
