Comparison of postoperative analgesic effects of low frequency tens and conventional tens used after abdominal hysterectomy [Abdominal histerektomi operasyonundan sonra düşük frekansli{dotless} tens ile konvansiyonel tens uygulamasi{dotless}ni{dotless}n postoperatif analjezik etkilerinin karşi{dotless}laşti{dotless}ri{dotless}lmasi{dotless}]

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorÇelik Y.
dc.contributor.authorGünüşen I.
dc.contributor.authorEyigör C.
dc.contributor.authorKaraman S.
dc.contributor.authorUyar M.
dc.contributor.authorDurmaz B.
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-26T21:57:28Z
dc.date.available2019-10-26T21:57:28Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.departmentEge Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractAim: Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) which is used to treat chronic pain syndromes has been reported to be of some utility in the treatment of post-surgical pain. The aim of this prospective, randomized, double-blinded study was to investigate the effects of high or low frequency-TENS on postoperative pain control after abdominal hysterectomy. Material and Methods: Forty patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy were randomly allocated to receive either low frequency or conventional TENS. Patient-controlled analgesia was applied to all patients with morphine infusions for postoperative analgesia after surgery. Pain scores were assessed before and after each application of TENS. Sedation scores, total morphine consumption, additional analgesic requirement and adverse effects were recorded. Results: Pain score was significantly lower after TENS application in both groups (except at 18th hours). There was a statistically significant intergroup difference only at 30th mins, postoperatively for morphine delivery (p=0,012). Morphine consumption, adverse effects and sedation scores (except 18th hours) were similar in both groups. Conclusion: There was no difference between low and high frequency-TENS for morphine consumption after abdominal hysterectomy. In both groups, pain scores were significantly lower than baseline values after each application of TENS.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5222/JTAICS.2011.224
dc.identifier.endpage231en_US
dc.identifier.issn1304-0871
dc.identifier.issn1304-0871en_US
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/Aen_US
dc.identifier.startpage224en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5222/JTAICS.2011.224
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11454/19069
dc.identifier.volume39en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofTurk Anesteziyoloji ve Reanimasyon Dernegi Dergisien_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectMorphineen_US
dc.subjectPatient-controlled analgesiaen_US
dc.subjectPostoperative painen_US
dc.subjectTENSen_US
dc.titleComparison of postoperative analgesic effects of low frequency tens and conventional tens used after abdominal hysterectomy [Abdominal histerektomi operasyonundan sonra düşük frekansli{dotless} tens ile konvansiyonel tens uygulamasi{dotless}ni{dotless}n postoperatif analjezik etkilerinin karşi{dotless}laşti{dotless}ri{dotless}lmasi{dotless}]en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu