Are antibacterial component additions in etchants and adhesives effective against Streptococcus Mutans?

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorAtalayin, Cigdem
dc.contributor.authorTurkun, L. Sebnem
dc.contributor.authorAtes, Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorKemaloglu, Hande
dc.contributor.authorTurkun, Murat
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-27T10:44:31Z
dc.date.available2019-10-27T10:44:31Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.departmentEge Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractThe aim was to investigate the antibacterial activity of various acids and adhesives with and without antibacterial components against Streptococcus mutans. The antibacterial activities of 35% phosphoric acid (Ultra-Etch), 37% phosphoric acid with benzalkonium chloride (Etch-37), adhesive with chlorhexidine (Peak Universal Bond) and without any agent (PQ1) were investigated by agar-diffusion test. The inhibition-zones were measured after 48 h of incubation. For the tooth-cavity model test; cylindrical cavities were prepared on occlusal dentin surfaces of human molars and divided into four groups (n = 10 cavity/group). Group 1: Ultra-Etch + Peak Universal Bond, Group 2: Ultra-Etch + PQ1, Group 3: Etch-37 + PQ1 were applied. The fourth group without any agent application served as control. The teeth were immersed in 5.8 x 10(6) cfu/ml of S. mutans solution to infect the cavities for 72 h before the application of the groups. After 72 h, dentin chips were collected from the cavity walls with burs for bacterial counting. Statistical analysis was performed by ANOVA, Bonferroni and Dunnett C tests (p < 0.05). Ultra-Etch and Etch-37 performed similar antibacterial activities in agar-diffusion test. Both acids showed better antibacterial activity compared to adhesives (p < 0.05). The antibacterial activity of PQ1 and Peak Universal Bond was observed to be inactivated by light-polymerization. According to the tooth-cavity model; Group I, II, and III demonstrated reduction in bacterial number and there was no significant difference between them. Antibacterial component additions in etchant and adhesive did not show superior antibacterial activity against S. mutans in both in vitro tests.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/01694243.2017.1350523
dc.identifier.endpage206en_US
dc.identifier.issn0169-4243
dc.identifier.issn1568-5616
dc.identifier.issn0169-4243en_US
dc.identifier.issn1568-5616en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage197en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2017.1350523
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11454/30993
dc.identifier.volume32en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000428110500007en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Adhesion Science and Technologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAntibacterialen_US
dc.subjectetchanten_US
dc.subjectbenzalkonium chlorideen_US
dc.subjectadhesiveen_US
dc.subjectchlorhexidineen_US
dc.titleAre antibacterial component additions in etchants and adhesives effective against Streptococcus Mutans?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu