Comparative analysis of a modified cascade refrigeration cycle including an auto-cascade refrigeration cycle using different zeotropic refrigerant mixtures for reducing the environmental impact

Küçük Resim Yok

Tarih

2024

Dergi Başlığı

Dergi ISSN

Cilt Başlığı

Yayıncı

Elsevier

Erişim Hakkı

info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess

Özet

The two primary challenges in auto-cascade refrigeration (ACR) cycles are high compressor discharge temperatures and low efficiency at ultra-low temperatures. This study proposes a modified cascade refrigeration cycle (MCR) combined with an ACR cycle for cooling to -60 degrees C. The innovative aspect of this work is to improve the ACR performance with simpler designs without increasing the system complexity, contrary to the common trend. For the high-temperature cycle (HTC), a dual evaporator refrigeration cycle with R1234yf is used while an ACR cycle is used for the low-temperature cycle (LTC). Environmentally friendly refrigerant mixtures, such as R170/ R290, R170/R600a, and R170/R600, were analyzed using energy, exergy, and exergoeconomic methods. The results show that compared to R23/R134a, the R170/R600 significantly improves the performance of the MCR by increasing the COP and exergy efficiency by 24.0 %, and reducing the exergy destruction by 26 %, unit cooling cost by 11.2 %, and total investment cost by 9.7 %. Moreover, when compared with theoretical studies COP improvements range from 38.7 % to 94.1 %, demonstrating the importance and superiority of the system proposed in this study.

Açıklama

Anahtar Kelimeler

BTEX, Gas chromatography, Nanocomposite, Solid phase microextraction, Taguchi experimental design

Kaynak

Process Safety and Environmental Protection

WoS Q Değeri

Q1

Scopus Q Değeri

Q1

Cilt

193

Sayı

Dec

Künye

Karacayli, I., Altay, L., & Hepbasli, A. (2025). Comparative analysis of a modified cascade refrigeration cycle including an auto-cascade refrigeration cycle using different zeotropic refrigerant mixtures for reducing the environmental impact. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 193, 976-989.