Multi-criteria decision-making approach for selecting a structural system of an industrial facility

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorscopusid57936450500
dc.authorscopusid57936450600
dc.authorscopusid36642782000
dc.contributor.authorZumrut, Irem Bayram
dc.contributor.authorBaran, Hamim Burak
dc.contributor.authorOzbalta, Turkan Goksal
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-12T20:12:20Z
dc.date.available2023-01-12T20:12:20Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentN/A/Departmenten_US
dc.description.abstractSelection of an appropriate structural system for an industrial facility is a difficult task for decision makers since it is the essential component, and it is hard to satisfy the owner's demands as well as the legal requirements. There are many conflicting preferences that have to be considered to assess the performance of the structural system alternatives. Decision support systems (DSSs) such as multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods are useful in making an objective and rational choice. It is important to use MCDM methods in order to analytically evaluate different factors affecting the structural system selection. To address these challenges, the selection of the structural system of an industrial facility project in Turkey was carried out by applying Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) MCDM methods. Eight evaluation criteria were determined for the selection process within the scope of the study, which are project cost, project duration, project lifetime, labour and equipment requirement, recycling opportunities, resistance to environmental effects, suitability for installation and natural lighting needs. Prefabricated reinforced concrete (PRC), on-site reinforced concrete (RC) and steel structural system alternatives were evaluated according to each criterion by a survey study conducted by 193 civil engineer participants. Using the AHP and TOPSIS methods, it is determined that the most suitable alternative for industrial facilities is the steel structural framing system. The results were argued with the design team, and they confirmed that MCDM methods could be easily integrated in selecting the most appropriate structural system.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.2478/otmcj-2022-0010
dc.identifier.endpage2665en_US
dc.identifier.issn1847-5450
dc.identifier.issn1847-6228
dc.identifier.issn1847-5450en_US
dc.identifier.issn1847-6228en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85140308138en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/Aen_US
dc.identifier.startpage2656en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.2478/otmcj-2022-0010
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11454/78289
dc.identifier.volume14en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000868351800001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSciendoen_US
dc.relation.ispartofOrganization Technology And Management In Constructionen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectstructural system selectionen_US
dc.subjectindustrial facilityen_US
dc.subjectmulti-criteria decision-making methodsen_US
dc.subjectAHPen_US
dc.subjectTOPSISen_US
dc.subjectprefabricated reinforced concreteen_US
dc.subjecton-site reinforced concreteen_US
dc.titleMulti-criteria decision-making approach for selecting a structural system of an industrial facilityen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu