Yazar "Levent R.E." seçeneğine göre listele

Listeleniyor 1 - 2 / 2
  • Küçük Resim Yok
    Öğe
    Evaluation of cardiac arrhythmia in pediatric patients with Left Ventricular Assist Device (L-VAD)
    (Verduci Editore s.r.l, 2024) Doğan E.; Ergin F.; Beyter M.B.; Kaşikçi G.K.; Ay O.; Levent R.E.; Engin Ç.
    – OBJECTIVE: Pediatric heart failure is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in childhood. Left ventricular assist devices (L-VAD) are used for bridging to transplantation in patients with indications for heart transplantation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The children included in the study were patients who underwent implantation of an L-VAD due to advanced heart failure at Ege University Faculty of Medicine Hospital between January 2009 and January 2023. RESULTS: Of the 33 patients who underwent L-VAD implantation, 16 (48.5%) were female and 17 (51.5%) were male. The median age at surgery was 13 years (IQR, 9.5-15). The median weight was 44 kg (IQR, 25.65-52), the median height was 158 cm (IQR, 134.5-168.5), and the median body surface area was 1.37 m2 (IQR, 0.95-1.51). All patients who underwent L-VAD implantation had an echocardiographic diagnosis of dilated cardiomyopathy. The patients underwent a median of 16 (IQR, 9-21) ECGs, and the median number of 24-hour Holter ECGs obtained was 3 (IQR, 2-5). Arrhythmias that occurred after L-VAD implantation were classified as atrial and ventricular. Ventricular arrhythmia included ventricular tachycardia (VT) lasting for more than 30 seconds (sustained VT), VT lasting for less than 30 seconds (nonsustained VT), and ventricular fibrillation. Atrial arrhythmias included atrial flutter, atrial fibrillation, supraventricular tachycardia, and atrial ectopic tachycardia. During the follow-up, atrial or ventricular arrhythmias were observed in 11 (33%) patients. The most common rhythm disturbances before L-VAD implantation were ventricular arrhythmias, while after the surgery, atrial arrhythmias were found to be the most frequent. A total of 5 patients underwent cardioversion (n=2) or defibrillation (n=3) due to arrhythmia. CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing L-VAD implantation, rhythm disorders that could normally lead to hemodynamic instability are frequently encountered. In these rhythm disorders, medical therapy should be attempted before resorting to cardioversion or defibrillation, and subsequently, more aggressive treatment methods should be considered. © 2024 Verduci Editore s.r.l. All rights reserved.
  • Küçük Resim Yok
    Öğe
    A retrospective survey comparing suture techniques regarding the risk of permanent epicardial pacemaker implantation after ventricular septal defect closure
    (Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular, 2018) Ayık M.F.; Şişli E.; Dereli M.; Şahan Y.Ö.; Şahin H.; Levent R.E.; Atay Y.
    Objective: The aim of this study is to compare the continuous and combined suturing techniques in regards to the needing epicardial pacing at the time of weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass (EP-CPB) and to evaluate permanent epicardial pacemaker (PEP) implantation in patients who had undergone surgical ventricular septal defect (VSD) closure. Methods: This single-centre retrospective survey includes 365 patients who had consecutively undergone VSD closure between January 2006 and October 2015. Results: The median age and weight of the patients were 15 months (range 27 days – 56.9 years) and 10 kg (range 3.5 – 100 kg), respectively. Continuous and combined suturing techniques were utilised in 302 (82.7%) and 63 (17.3%) patients, respectively. While 25 (6.8%) patients required EP-CPB, PEP was implanted in eight (2.2%) patients. Comparison of the continuous and combined suturing techniques regarding the need for EP-CPB (72% vs. 28%, P=0.231) and PEP implantation (87.5% vs. 12.5%, P=1.0) were not statistically significant. The rate of PEP implantation in patients with perimembraneous VSD without extension and perimembraneous VSD with inlet extension did not reveal significant difference between the suture techniques (P=1.0 and P=0.16, respectively). In both univariate and multivariate analyses, large VSD (P=0.001; OR 8.63; P=0.011) and perimembraneous VSD with inlet extension (P<0.001; OR 9.02; P=0.005) had a significant influence on PEP implantation. Conclusion: Both suturing techniques were comparable regarding the need for EP-CPB or PEP implantation. Caution should be exercised when closing a large perimembraneous VSD with inlet extension. © 2018, Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular. All rights reserved.