Khairy, AmiraHejres, SuhaElbahr, UmranDayyab, FarouqDelos Reyes, Clark StevenPastrana, Jennie AnnVineeth, Chithra2024-08-312024-08-3120241121-7138https://hdl.handle.net/11454/104719Herein, we aimed to investigate the antifungal susceptibility pattern of Candida auris clinical strains in our setting Bahrain Oncology Center-King Hamad University Hospital-Bahrain. C. auris strains isolated from different clinical specimens in the Microbiology Laboratory from October-2021 to November-2022 were evaluated. Species-level identification of fungi was performed by MALDI-TOF (Bruker, Germany). Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was determined either by E-test strips or by MICRONAUT MIC system based on CDC guidelines for C. auris antifungal interpretation. Fluconazole, amphotericin-B, voriconazole, and caspofungin susceptibility data of the clinical strains were analyzed. A total of 40 clinical isolates were included: 25% were blood culture isolates, 65% were urinary, and 10% were soft tissue isolates. Only 29 strains could be tested for amphotericin-B and 32 for voriconazole. Overall resistance pattern was as follows: 100% resistance to fluconazole, 2.5% resistance to caspofungin, and 0% resistance to amphotericin b. Median voriconazole MIC was 0.015 ug/ml (min 0.08, max= 0.064 ug/ml). We had no fluconazole-sensitive strain and only one caspofungin-resistant strain. A single isolate (2.5%), which was associated with candidemia, demonstrated resistance to two antifungal agents: fluconazole and caspofungin. No triple or quadruple drug resistant strain existed.eninfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessEpidemiologyCandidemiaAntifungalCandiduriaArticle472152156WOS:0012729819000042-s2.0-8519912745039023524Q3N/A