Marangudakis, Manussos2019-10-272019-10-2720130591-23850591-2385https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9744.2012.01321.xhttps://hdl.handle.net/11454/46692The eutopia vision of the future, promulgated by technoscientists and libertarian thinkers, could herald the coming of a third axial age that could reshape and reformulate the legacy of the Great Religions and their transcendental moral imperatives, and of Modernity and the democratic imperative of equality of social conditions. A sociological diagnosis of a third, technosomatic, morality, is not a matter of supporting or rejecting such a possibility, but a matter of detecting its rise and regulating its impact.en10.1111/j.1467-9744.2012.01321.xinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessbioethicsbiotechnologyChristianitycultural evolutionselfCLARIFYING THE EUTOPIA ARGUMENT: A RESPONSE TO JOHN CAIAZZAArticle481128130WOS:000315405400010N/A