Tamosiunaite, IevaVasiliauskas, ArunasDindaroglu, Furkan2024-08-252024-08-2520230003-32191945-7103https://doi.org/10.2319/072822-527.1403https://hdl.handle.net/11454/99925Objectives: To evaluate the content and quality of information about orthodontic pain on YouTube.Materials and Methods: YouTube was searched using the keywords orthodontic painand brace pain.A total of 65 videos were chosen for the final analysis. Videos were classified into high-and low-content groups using an eight-point scoring system and reviewed according to selected orthodontic pain-related topics. Video quality was rated by the Video Information and Quality Index (VIQI) and Global Quality Scale (GQS). Statistical data analysis was performed using SPSS 28.0 software, Mann-Whitney U-tests, v2 tests, and Spearman correlation coefficients.Results: Most YouTube videos related to orthodontic pain were low content (86.2%), and a few were high content (13.8%). Pharmacological pain relief was the most prevalent topic (50.8%), followed by duration of pain (32.3%) and influence of pain on patient quality of life (29.2%). The least-mentioned topic was possible location of pain (7.7%). Most of the videos were uploaded by laypeople (64.6%). Videos uploaded by dental professionals had significantly higher means of GQS scores (P = .035), flow of information (P < .001), information quality (P = .008), and total VIQI (P < .001). Compared with low-content, high-content videos had a higher mean of flow of information (P = .037). There was a weak correlation between total content and GQS scores and a strong correlation between GQS and VIQI scores (r = 0.740; P < .01). Conclusions: Overall, YouTube was found to be an inadequate source of information on orthodontic pain. (Angle Orthod. 2023;93:403-408.)en10.2319/072822-527.1403info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessOrthodontic painBrace painYouTubeSocial mediaInternetResourceVideosArticle934403408WOS:00102656210000536820821Q1