Bodilsen J.D'Alessandris Q.G.Humphreys H.Iro M.A.Klein M.Last K.Montesinos I.L.2024-08-312024-08-3120241198-743Xhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2024.01.026https://hdl.handle.net/11454/103876The authors regret an inconsistency in the reported quality of evidence for Key Question 4 concerning whether neurosurgical aspiration or excision should be used in patients with brain abscess. The reported quality of evidence was described as “low” in the abstract and Table 1 and should instead be “moderate” as stated in the main text. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused. © 2024 The Author(s)en10.1016/j.cmi.2024.01.026info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessadultbrain abscesschildcommunicable diseasecontrolled studydiagnosisdrug therapyerratumhumaninfectionmicrobiologynonhumanoral drug administrationpractice guidelinesurgerydrug comparisonEuropeanCorrigendum to “European society of clinical microbiology and infectious diseases guidelines on diagnosis and treatment of brain abscess in children and adults” [Clin Microbiol and Infect 30(1) (2024 Jan) 66–89 Doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2023.08.016] (Clinical Microbiology and Infection (2024) 30(1) (66–89), (S1198743X23003993), (10.1016/j.cmi.2023.08.016))Erratum3056982-s2.0-8518729045538309325Q1