AN EVALUATION ON CLASSIFICATION OF HUMOR THEORIES
| dc.contributor.author | R, Selami Fedak | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-01-12T20:37:10Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2023-01-12T20:37:10Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
| dc.department | N/A/Department | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | Humor-related literary genres occupy a significant place in literary research and history to the extent that western scholarship in particular, often treats humor and related literary genres almost as an autonomous disci- pline. Although certain studies that address the emergence of humor focus on the three main theories, namely “superiority”, “incongruity” and “relief” they may be divergent in creating interdependent sub-theories. There- fore, these theoretical approaches as a whole require classification pertaining to the history of humor, to the modes of creating it, and to the disciplines that interpret it. Based on this, the subject of the present essay is the classification of the humor theories in terms of historical periods, style of humor conception, and academic disciplines. Moreover, introduction of these classifications to Turkish scholars is the aim of the present study. Current studies on humor have been mostly put forward within certain theoretical frameworks. The most im- portant reason for the emergence of this theoretical tendency in the current studies on humor is that a large amount of knowledge has been obtained in the theoretical sense over time since the ancient age when the origins of studies on humor, and laughter emerged. In the early period, philosophers focused more on laughter, so the first theoretical approaches to laughter emerged during this period. However, many thinkers and scholars of the modern period have introduced different theoretical approaches through different perspectives on laughter and humor. Moreover, the current laughter and humor studies based on this theoretical background have become an interdisciplinary field of study with the participation of scholars from various disciplines such as literature, education, folklore, anthropology, sociology, philosophy, history, communication, medicine, economics, and fine arts. As a result of the laughter and humor studies carried out in the course of its historical development process, laughter and humor theorists have established many humor theories. Aforementioned humor theories have been classified by scholars based on some of their unique characteristics. This study reclassifies the humor theories in terms of their similarities and differences under the titles “classifications according to historical periods”, “classifications of theory families and classifications due to the style of humor conception”, and “clas- sifications according to academic disciplines” and evaluate these theories and classifications as a whole. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.endpage | 62 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1300-3984 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2146-8087 | |
| dc.identifier.issue | 126 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.startpage | 52 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.trdizinid | 1119426 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://search.trdizin.gov.tr/yayin/detay/1119426 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11454/81594 | |
| dc.identifier.volume | 16 | en_US |
| dc.indekslendigikaynak | TR-Dizin | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Milli Folklor Dergisi | en_US |
| dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
| dc.title | AN EVALUATION ON CLASSIFICATION OF HUMOR THEORIES | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
