Antibakteriyel adeziv ile uygulanan kompomer ve nanofil kompozit restorasyonların bir yıllık klinik performansı
Küçük Resim Yok
Tarih
2007
Yazarlar
Dergi Başlığı
Dergi ISSN
Cilt Başlığı
Yayıncı
Erişim Hakkı
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Özet
Amaç: Antibakteriyal adeziv kullanılarak çürüksüz sınıf V lezyonlara uygulanan bir kompomer ve bir nanofil kompozitin 1 yıllık klinik performansını karşılaştırmaktır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmaya en az iki çürüksüz servikal lezyonu olan 24 hasta dahil edildi. Servikal lezyonlar bir kompomer materyal olan Dyract eXtra (Dentsply DeTrey, Almanya) ve nanofil bir kompozit olan Filtek Supreme (3M/ESPE, MN, ABD) ile restore edildi. Her materyale ait 50 restorasyon aynı self-etching adeziv sistem (Clearfil Protect Bond, Kuraray, Japonya) kullanılarak kenar bizotajı ve mekanik retansiyon yapılmadan yerlefltirildi. Tüm restorasyonlar bafllang›çta, 6. ay ve 1 yıllık süre sonunda renk uyumu, kenar renklenmesi, kenar uyumu, çürük oluflumu, anatomik form, postoperatif hassasiyet ve retansiyon açısından Ryge kriterlerinin modifikasyonu kullanılarak değerlendirildi. Parametrelerdeki değişimler Cohran Q ve Mc Nemar testleri ile karşılaştırıldı (p=0.05). Bulgular: Bir yıllık de¤erlendirme periyodu sonunda tüm restorasyonların ağız içinde kaldığı tespit edildi. incelenen restoratif materyaller arasında tüm değerlendirme kriterleri açısından istatistiksel fark tespit edilmedi (p>0.05). Ancak, bir hastanın iki Filtek Supreme restorasyonunda kenar renklenmesi ve renk de¤iflimi belirlendi. Sonuç: Her iki restoratif materyalin çürüksüz sınıf V lezyonlardaki 1 yıllık klinik performansı oldukça başarılı bulunmuştur.
Objective: To compare the clinical performance of a compomer and a nanofill composite applied with an antibacterial adhesive over a period of 1-year in non-carious Class V lesions. Material and Method: Twenty-four patients with at least two non-carious cervical lesions were enrolled in this study. Cervical lesions were restored with a compomer, Dyract eXtra (Dentsply DeTrey, Germany) and a nanofill composite, Filtek Supreme (3M/ESPE, MN, USA). Fifty restorations of each material were placed with no marginal bevels and no mechanical retentions using the same self-etch adhesive system (Clearfil Protect Bond, Kuraray, Japan). All lesions were evaluated at baseline, 6-month and 1-year periods using a modification of Ryge’s criteria in terms of color stability, marginal discoloration, marginal adaptation, caries formation, anatomic form, postoperative sensitivity and retention. The changes in parameters were assessed using Cochran Q and Mc Nemar tests (p=0.05). Results: All restorations were determined to be retained in the oral cavity at the end of 1-year observation period. No statistically differences were determined between the tested restorative materials in terms of all the evaluation criteria (p>0.05). However, two Filtek Supreme restorations of the same patient demonstrated marginal discoloration and a slight change in color. Conclusion: The one-year clinical performance of both restorative materials was found to be excellent.
Objective: To compare the clinical performance of a compomer and a nanofill composite applied with an antibacterial adhesive over a period of 1-year in non-carious Class V lesions. Material and Method: Twenty-four patients with at least two non-carious cervical lesions were enrolled in this study. Cervical lesions were restored with a compomer, Dyract eXtra (Dentsply DeTrey, Germany) and a nanofill composite, Filtek Supreme (3M/ESPE, MN, USA). Fifty restorations of each material were placed with no marginal bevels and no mechanical retentions using the same self-etch adhesive system (Clearfil Protect Bond, Kuraray, Japan). All lesions were evaluated at baseline, 6-month and 1-year periods using a modification of Ryge’s criteria in terms of color stability, marginal discoloration, marginal adaptation, caries formation, anatomic form, postoperative sensitivity and retention. The changes in parameters were assessed using Cochran Q and Mc Nemar tests (p=0.05). Results: All restorations were determined to be retained in the oral cavity at the end of 1-year observation period. No statistically differences were determined between the tested restorative materials in terms of all the evaluation criteria (p>0.05). However, two Filtek Supreme restorations of the same patient demonstrated marginal discoloration and a slight change in color. Conclusion: The one-year clinical performance of both restorative materials was found to be excellent.
Açıklama
Anahtar Kelimeler
Diş Hekimliği
Kaynak
Gazi Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi (.Acta Odontologica Turcica)
WoS Q Değeri
Scopus Q Değeri
Cilt
24
Sayı
1
