Comparison of 2 different flap techniques in the surgical removal of bilateral impacted mandibular third molars

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorBanu Koyuncu Özveri
dc.contributor.authorMert Zeytinoğlu
dc.contributor.authorErdoğan Çetingül
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-26T19:34:14Z
dc.date.available2019-10-26T19:34:14Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.departmentEge Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractAim: To estimate the effects of flap design on wound dehiscence and the postoperative side effects after the extraction of bilateral impacted mandibular third molars. Materials and methods: This study was designed as a randomized, clinical trial composed of a sample of subjects ≥18 years of age who required surgical extraction of the mandibular third molars. The predictor variable was flap type. A 3-cornered flap was used on one side and a modified triangular flap was used on the other. The primary outcome variable was wound dehiscence. The secondary outcome variables were pain, swelling, and trismus. Other variables were demographic and operative. Descriptive, bivariate statistics were computed. Significance was set at P < 0.05. Results: Forty patients who required removal of bilateral impacted third molars were included. There were no significant differences regarding wound dehiscence and postoperative side effects between the 2 flap techniques. Conclusion: Both flap designs obtained similar short-term outcomes in mandibular third molar surgeryen_US
dc.description.abstractAim: To estimate the effects of flap design on wound dehiscence and the postoperative side effects after the extraction of bilateral impacted mandibular third molars. Materials and methods: This study was designed as a randomized, clinical trial composed of a sample of subjects ≥18 years of age who required surgical extraction of the mandibular third molars. The predictor variable was flap type. A 3-cornered flap was used on one side and a modified triangular flap was used on the other. The primary outcome variable was wound dehiscence. The secondary outcome variables were pain, swelling, and trismus. Other variables were demographic and operative. Descriptive, bivariate statistics were computed. Significance was set at P < 0.05. Results: Forty patients who required removal of bilateral impacted third molars were included. There were no significant differences regarding wound dehiscence and postoperative side effects between the 2 flap techniques. Conclusion: Both flap designs obtained similar short-term outcomes in mandibular third molar surgeryen_US
dc.identifier.endpage898en_US
dc.identifier.issn1300-0144
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.startpage891en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://app.trdizin.gov.tr/makale/TWpFeE56RTVPUT09
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11454/10906
dc.identifier.volume43en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizinen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofTurkish Journal of Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US]
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectCerrahien_US
dc.titleComparison of 2 different flap techniques in the surgical removal of bilateral impacted mandibular third molarsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

TR-Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu