Opinions of Obstetricians and Midwives for Vaginal Birth after Cesarean Section: A Qualitative Study in Türkiye

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorBidik, Nazli Unlu
dc.contributor.authorTurfan, Esin Ceber
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-31T07:50:37Z
dc.date.available2024-08-31T07:50:37Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentEge Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND/AIMS: The most effective strategy to stop the increasing worldwide popularity of cesarean delivery and to break the logic of once a cesarean, always a cesarean is vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC). Health professionals are highly influential in women's birth preferences. Therefore, there is an urgent need to focus on the views of midwives and obstetricians about VBAC section. The aim of this study was to investigate the opinions of obstetricians and midwives about VBAC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study adopted two qualitative research approaches, phenomenology and case study. A total of 26 healthcare professionals, including 12 obstetricians and 14 midwives, were interviewed in this study. One-to-one in-depth phone interviews were held with the midwives and obstetricians and these interviews were audio-recorded. The obtained data were written out completely and analyzed thematically. This study aligns with the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research checklist. RESULTS: Three main themes and nine sub-themes were obtained in this research. The main themes described are Healthcare Professional CONCLUSION: As a result of the interviews, in addition to the lack of information about VBAC delivery, various factors which prevent this application from being widespread were determined. Accordingly, with these ideas in mind, there is a need to organize training programs in order to improve healthcare professionals' knowledge and skills about VBAC section. It is recommended to provide the necessary legal regulations and raise awareness on vaginal births after cesarean deliveries.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.4274/cjms.2023.2023-44
dc.identifier.endpage211en_US
dc.identifier.issn2149-7893
dc.identifier.issn2536-507X
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage205en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4274/cjms.2023.2023-44
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11454/105306
dc.identifier.volume9en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001274070500009en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherGalenos Publ Houseen_US
dc.relation.ispartofCyprus Journal of Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.snmz20240831_Uen_US
dc.subjectVaginal Birth After Cesarean Sectionen_US
dc.subjectObstetricianen_US
dc.subjectMidwifeen_US
dc.subjectQualitative Studyen_US
dc.titleOpinions of Obstetricians and Midwives for Vaginal Birth after Cesarean Section: A Qualitative Study in Türkiyeen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu